Food
preference measured by tokens as exchange tools in chimpanzees
Claudia
Sousa and Tetsuro Matsuzawa
University
of Coimbra, Portugal
Hominoids,
humans and the great apes, use a variety of tools in contrast to other living
primates such as monkeys and lemurs. Recent studies have established a long list
of tools utilized by wild chimpanzees. However, while the nature of chimpanzee
tool use is characterized by a one-to-one-correspondence between any particular
tool and its target item, humans have developed a unique tool referred to as a
"token". According to our definition, a token is an object that can be
used for various goals and has a symbolic relationship to the target. In our
society, there exist a large number of "symbolic tools", including
coins, bills, tickets, and cards, that can be exchanged for different classes of
desired items such as food, objects, comfort, and amusement. A token is unique
in several aspects. It is easy to handle and to transport, and can be exchanged
for various kinds of items. Values remain unchanged for extended periods such
that a token can be saved. In this sense, it can function both as tool and as an
effective reward. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the
symbolic-tool aspect of tokens in a free choice situation in chimpanzees. Two
adult female chimpanzees, Ai and Pendesa, served as subjects. They had already
had some experience in the use of tokens. The subjects performed a symbolic
matching-to-sample task involving associations between color and visual symbols.
A token reward (a Japanese 100-yen coin) was given for each correct response.
After each receipt of a token as the reward, subjects were allowed to exchange
it for their preferred food by inserting it into a specially constructed
"vending machine". A free choice situation followed the insertion of
every coin, where two pictures showing different food items appeared on the
monitor. As the chimpanzees indicated their favored choice, the vending device
delivered the corresponding food item. We tested 45 possible combinations of 10
different food items. The subjects worked spontaneously for the tokens; Ai saved
a few consecutive coins and Pendesa saved up to 15-30 before exchanging them for
food. There was no significant difference between subjects in their total choice
frequencies. The chimpanzees' order of preference was as follows. Ai: pistachio,
blueberry, peanut, banana, chow, raisin, grape, potato, carrot, and apple;
Pendesa: blueberry, pistachio, peanut, raisin, chow, grape, potato, banana,
apple, and carrot. The rank correlation between our two subjects was r=.691.
These results demonstrate that both subjects worked for tokens as rewards, and
used them as tools to obtain different food items in various choice contexts.
The use of tokens provided a sensitive scale of preference for food items in
chimpanzees.
Sousa,
Claudia
University of Coimbra
Largo D. Dinis - 3000 Coimbra, Portugal
caia@ci.uc.pt