Auditory
categorization in pigeons
Satoru
Ishikawa
Kyoto
University, Japan
There
are many studies on the ability for categorizing or conceptualizing objects in
nonhuman animals (Thompson, 1995, Watanabe, Lea, & Dittrich, 1993). However,
as our knowledge on these cognitive processes is mostly limited to the visual
modality, we are unable to discuss about similarities and differences of
categorization processes among various sensory modalities such as vision and
audition. In the present research, I studied category discrimination in the
auditory modality. I prepared two categories, the 'Strings' and the 'Flute',
differing in timbre. Each category had 20 stimuli made by combinations of five
fundamental frequencies and four elements changed in frequency modulation (FM)
and temporal envelope. Four pigeons (Columba livia) were trained to
discriminate these categories with auditory-visual cross-modal symbolic
matching-to-sample (MTS) tasks (Ishikawa & Iwamoto, 1995). Auditory stimuli
were presented as a sample of MTS tasks, and two colored squares (red/green)
were presented as comparison stimuli. Two pigeons learned this discrimination,
but the remaining two pigeons did not learn within one hundred training
sessions. After training, the two pigeons who had learned this discrimination
received two generalization tests. One of the tests was to investigate
generalization to novel elements differing in temporal envelope and frequency
modulation (novel timbre test), the other was to investigate generalization to
novel fundamental frequencies (novel pitch test). Twenty novel stimuli were
presented in each test. In the novel timbre test, two pigeons showed good
generalization to the test stimuli. In the novel pitch test, one pigeon
generalized discrimination to the test stimuli. The other bird generalized
discrimination to the test stimuli with 'Flute', but did not do so to the test
stimuli with 'Strings'. These results demonstrated that pigeons were able to
discriminate two categories depending on the difference of timbre. However, it
is also suggested that generalization to novel stimuli could be affected by
other factors such as fundamental frequency.
Ishikawa,
S., & Iwamoto, T. (1995). Timbre discrimination in pigeons using conditional
matching-to-sample task. Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology, 45,
43-50 (in Japanese).
Thompson,
R. K. R. (1995). Natural and relational concepts in animals. In H. L. Roitblat
and J.-A. Meyer (Eds.), Comparative approaches to cognitive science (pp.
175-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Watanabe,
S., Lea, S. E. G., & Dittrich, W. H. (1993). What can we learn from
experiments on pigeon concept discrimination? In H. J. Bishof and H. P. Zeigler
(Eds.), Avian vision and cognition (pp. 351-376). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
Ishikawa,
Satoru
Department of Psychology, Kyoto University
Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
ishikawa@kupsy.kyoto-u.ac.jp